Like a Brother
I have a close friend I have never met, at least not in any way I remember.
He insists that our paths crossed years ago at an event. He may be right. If it happened, he remembers a meeting I do not. For all practical purposes, our friendship has existed at a distance.
We have exchanged thousands of messages over the years. We have argued about politics, philosophy, psychology, business, relationships, parenting, and whatever question happened to catch one of us at the wrong hour. Some conversations lasted days. Others went quiet and resurfaced months later as if the pause had been part of the sentence.
He is one of the most intellectually stimulating people I know.
Not because he agrees with me. Often he does not. He notices assumptions I have mistaken for conclusions. He introduces an angle I would not have reached alone. At times he irritates me into thinking more carefully, which may be one of the most useful things a friend can do.
The affection is real. So is the trust.
But I have never confused the friendship with something it cannot be.
Continue reading
If my car breaks down, he is not coming to help. If I need someone to pick up my children, he is not the person to call. If a family emergency requires a body in a room, the distance between us remains real no matter how close a conversation has made us feel.
None of this disappoints me.
I know what the friendship is.
Just as importantly, I know what it is not.
There is no expectation that one day he will become local, practical, and available in ways the relationship has never promised. What we exchange does not become less meaningful because it has boundaries. The conversations, challenge, respect, and intellectual companionship are not inferior forms of friendship waiting to graduate into something more complete.
They are the friendship.
Its limits do not diminish it. They may be part of what has allowed it to last.
